| dc.contributor.author | Kaskenpalo, P | |
| dc.contributor.author | MacDonell, SG | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-12T02:47:03Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-03-12T02:47:03Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-03-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Evidential Assessment of Software Technologies (EAST2012) , Lund, Sweden, pp.27 - 32 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10292/5219 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The potential disconnect between research and practice in software engineering (SE) means that the uptake of research outcomes has at times been limited. In this paper we seek to identify research approaches that are rigorous in terms of method but that are also relevant to software engineering practitioners. After considering the correspondence of several approaches to software systems research and practice we recommend a framework for applying grounded theory in SE research, as a means of delivering both robust and useful outcomes. | |
| dc.publisher | ACM Press | |
| dc.relation.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2372233.2372242 | |
| dc.rights | © ACM, 2012. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in PUBLICATION (see Citation), (see Publisher’s Version). | |
| dc.subject | Research | |
| dc.subject | Practice | |
| dc.subject | Design science | |
| dc.subject | Software engineering | |
| dc.subject | Grounded theory | |
| dc.title | Valuing evaluation: methodologies to bridge research and practice | |
| dc.type | Conference Contribution | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | OpenAccess | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1145/2372233.2372242 | |
| aut.conference.type | Paper Published in Proceedings | |
| aut.relation.endpage | 32 | |
| aut.relation.startpage | 27 | |
| pubs.elements-id | 139051 | |
